In this dissertation, I argue that if the kalam cosmological argument works, then it must work on either the A-theory of time or the B-theory of time. I offer several arguments for thinking that the kalam does not work on either the A-theory of time or the B-theory of time. The two main versions of the A-theory, presentism and the growing block theory, are considered. Even though I argue that the growing block theorist has the greatest chance of making the kalam work, I nonetheless argue that their attempts fail for various reasons. In the end, the kalam is left unsupported by any major theory of time and is therefore vitiated.
| Date of Award | 12 Jun 2023 |
|---|
| Original language | English |
|---|
| Awarding Institution | |
|---|
| Supervisor | Simon Prosser (Supervisor) & Colin Philip Johnstone (Supervisor) |
|---|
- Kalam cosmological argument
- Philosophy of religion
- Philosophy of time
- B-theory of time
- A-theory of time
- Time travel
Running out of time: the temporal case against the kalam
Bray, N. (Author). 12 Jun 2023
Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis (MPhil)