Abstract
Most workers around the world are part of the precariat, characterized by non-permanent, informal, short-term, low-pay, low-skill, and insecure jobs. While there have been many socio-economic critiques of the negative impacts of precarity on workers, the literature has increasingly asked how precarious workers actually live their lives and how their subjectivities are produced on a daily basis. We contribute to this literature by providing a psychosocial account of the ambivalent experiences of precarious workers. We contend that the interplay of recognition and misrecognition plays a crucial role, as the vulnerable, working subject becomes entangled in a complex web of recognizability. We present insights from 104 in-depth interviews, providing a Lacanian analysis of how precarious workers develop unconscious attachments to neoliberal values that are central to the logic of precarity. Understanding this ambivalence helps us develop a more nuanced view of an ethics of precarious workers’ vulnerability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Human Relations |
| Volume | OnlineFirst |
| Early online date | 10 Aug 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 10 Aug 2023 |
Keywords
- Ambivalence
- Butler
- Lacan
- Precarity
- Subjectivity
- Vulnerability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Working through (mis)recognition: understanding vulnerability as ambivalence in precarious worker subjectivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver