Working group on bycatch of protected species (WGBYC 2020)

Mikel Basterretxea, Sara Bonanomi, Kim Bærum, Julia Carlström, Bram Couperus, Laurent Dubroca, Peter Evans, Nicole Hielscher, Katarzyna Kaminska, Ailbhe Kavanagh, Al Kingston, Sara Königson, Sven Koschinski, Finn Larsen, Evgenia Lefkaditou, Cian Luck, Kelly Macleod, Ana Marçalo, Julius Morkūnas, Estanis MugerzaMikko Olin, Hélène Peltier, Māris Plikšs, Ricardo Sagarminaga van Buiten, Guðjón Sigurðsson, Marije Siemensma, Adam Woźniczka, ICES WGBYC

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

WGBYC planned to address seven Terms of Reference, one of which was a special request from the European Commission on emergency bycatch mitigation measures for common dolphin in the Bay of Biscay and harbour porpoise in the Baltic Sea (ToR G). ToR G demanded a great deal of resources from WGBYC and, coupled with the COVID–19 disruption where WGBYC work had to be carried out remotely, this meant it was not possible to complete all tasks. The 2020 report is structured in the same order as the ToRs. Note that ToR E was not addressed while ToR G is reported in WKEMBYC (2020). All data submissions were requested via a formal WGBYC/ICES data call (Annex 6: below). The data call requested data on fishing effort, monitoring effort and PETS (protected, endangered, and threatened species of marine mammals, seabirds, reptiles, and fish) bycatch incidents in 2018. 19 of the 24 countries that contacted (18 ICES countries and 6 Mediterranean non-ICES countries) responded. WGBYC did not accept data brought to the meeting, but where problems were found during assessments with country submissions, updated versions were accepted. The quality and scope of Member States (MS) reports on the implementation of Regulation 812/2004 (cetacean bycatch) during 2018 remain varied (ToR A). Most countries have relied on monitoring through their DCF sampling programmes rather than implementing dedicated ob-server programmes. This means that métiers that pose the greatest risk of cetacean bycatch are generally under-sampled and bycatch is underestimated. Regulation 812/2004 was repealed and replaced in June 2019 by the Technical Conservation Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1241) and PETS bycatch monitoring is further implemented through the EU-MAP (Regula-tion (EU) 2017/1004). For 2018, data received through the WGBYC data call amounted to 82 cetaceans (5 species); 175 seals (4 species), 696 birds (at least 22 species); 37 644 elasmobranchs (at least 49 species); 2061 teleost fish (9 species) and 134 turtles (at least 2 species). Equivalent data from non-EU countries was also received from the USA and Iceland. Bycatch of marine mammals was observed in all ecoregions and several gears including gillnets, traps, longlines, and trawls. Seabirds were by-caught in most ecoregions, mainly in nets and longlines. In 2018, bycaught marine turtles were recorded mostly in set nets and trawls in the Mediterranean and in longlines in the Azores. High bycatch rates were observed for some elasmobranch species which are of conservation concern, particularly in trawl gears in the Celtic Sea, the Greater North Sea and Western Mediterranean, and nets in the Celtic Sea. In the US Northwest Atlantic, the gear of most concern are set nets for marine mammals and sea turtles. The gears of most concern in Iceland are set nets (birds and marine mammals) and longlines (birds). Eight countries also contributed numbers of bycaught stranded cetaceans. Bycatch was the predominant cause of death of common dolphins stranded in the Bay of Biscay and Channel. Member states compliance with the ‘pinger’ requirements of Regulation 812/2004 is difficult to gauge from the submitted reports due to reporting inconsistencies and incomplete information (ToR B). Only the United Kingdom appears to comply fully, reporting that all relevant vessels are equipped with “DDD” pingers used under a derogation and there is active enforcement in place. But in general, there has been little progress in the mitigation of cetacean bycatch and the effectiveness of pingers appears to vary among fishing métiers and geographical areas. WGBYC continues to have insufficient data to examine bycatch rates according to pinger use within their database.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCopenhagen
PublisherInternational council for the exploration of the sea (ICES)/Conseil international pour l'exploration de la mer (CIEM)
Number of pages222
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Publication series

NameICES scientific reports
No.81
Volume2
ISSN (Print)2618-1371

Keywords

  • Bycatch
  • Fishing effort
  • Protected species
  • Greather North Sea
  • Bay of Biscay
  • Iberian waters
  • Elasmobranchs
  • Marine mammals
  • Seabirds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Working group on bycatch of protected species (WGBYC 2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this