TY - BOOK
T1 - Working group on bycatch of protected species (WGBYC 2020)
AU - Basterretxea, Mikel
AU - Bonanomi, Sara
AU - Bærum, Kim
AU - Carlström, Julia
AU - Couperus, Bram
AU - Dubroca, Laurent
AU - Evans, Peter
AU - Hielscher, Nicole
AU - Kaminska, Katarzyna
AU - Kavanagh, Ailbhe
AU - Kingston, Al
AU - Königson, Sara
AU - Koschinski, Sven
AU - Larsen, Finn
AU - Lefkaditou, Evgenia
AU - Luck, Cian
AU - Macleod, Kelly
AU - Marçalo, Ana
AU - Morkūnas, Julius
AU - Mugerza, Estanis
AU - Olin, Mikko
AU - Peltier, Hélène
AU - Plikšs, Māris
AU - van Buiten, Ricardo Sagarminaga
AU - Sigurðsson, Guðjón
AU - Siemensma, Marije
AU - Woźniczka, Adam
AU - ICES WGBYC
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - WGBYC planned to address seven Terms of Reference, one of which was a special request from the European Commission on emergency bycatch mitigation measures for common dolphin in the Bay of Biscay and harbour porpoise in the Baltic Sea (ToR G). ToR G demanded a great deal of resources from WGBYC and, coupled with the COVID–19 disruption where WGBYC work had to be carried out remotely, this meant it was not possible to complete all tasks. The 2020 report is structured in the same order as the ToRs. Note that ToR E was not addressed while ToR G is reported in WKEMBYC (2020). All data submissions were requested via a formal WGBYC/ICES data call (Annex 6: below). The data call requested data on fishing effort, monitoring effort and PETS (protected, endangered, and threatened species of marine mammals, seabirds, reptiles, and fish) bycatch incidents in 2018. 19 of the 24 countries that contacted (18 ICES countries and 6 Mediterranean non-ICES countries) responded. WGBYC did not accept data brought to the meeting, but where problems were found during assessments with country submissions, updated versions were accepted. The quality and scope of Member States (MS) reports on the implementation of Regulation 812/2004 (cetacean bycatch) during 2018 remain varied (ToR A). Most countries have relied on monitoring through their DCF sampling programmes rather than implementing dedicated ob-server programmes. This means that métiers that pose the greatest risk of cetacean bycatch are generally under-sampled and bycatch is underestimated. Regulation 812/2004 was repealed and replaced in June 2019 by the Technical Conservation Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1241) and PETS bycatch monitoring is further implemented through the EU-MAP (Regula-tion (EU) 2017/1004). For 2018, data received through the WGBYC data call amounted to 82 cetaceans (5 species); 175 seals (4 species), 696 birds (at least 22 species); 37 644 elasmobranchs (at least 49 species); 2061 teleost fish (9 species) and 134 turtles (at least 2 species). Equivalent data from non-EU countries was also received from the USA and Iceland. Bycatch of marine mammals was observed in all ecoregions and several gears including gillnets, traps, longlines, and trawls. Seabirds were by-caught in most ecoregions, mainly in nets and longlines. In 2018, bycaught marine turtles were recorded mostly in set nets and trawls in the Mediterranean and in longlines in the Azores. High bycatch rates were observed for some elasmobranch species which are of conservation concern, particularly in trawl gears in the Celtic Sea, the Greater North Sea and Western Mediterranean, and nets in the Celtic Sea. In the US Northwest Atlantic, the gear of most concern are set nets for marine mammals and sea turtles. The gears of most concern in Iceland are set nets (birds and marine mammals) and longlines (birds). Eight countries also contributed numbers of bycaught stranded cetaceans. Bycatch was the predominant cause of death of common dolphins stranded in the Bay of Biscay and Channel. Member states compliance with the ‘pinger’ requirements of Regulation 812/2004 is difficult to gauge from the submitted reports due to reporting inconsistencies and incomplete information (ToR B). Only the United Kingdom appears to comply fully, reporting that all relevant vessels are equipped with “DDD” pingers used under a derogation and there is active enforcement in place. But in general, there has been little progress in the mitigation of cetacean bycatch and the effectiveness of pingers appears to vary among fishing métiers and geographical areas. WGBYC continues to have insufficient data to examine bycatch rates according to pinger use within their database.
AB - WGBYC planned to address seven Terms of Reference, one of which was a special request from the European Commission on emergency bycatch mitigation measures for common dolphin in the Bay of Biscay and harbour porpoise in the Baltic Sea (ToR G). ToR G demanded a great deal of resources from WGBYC and, coupled with the COVID–19 disruption where WGBYC work had to be carried out remotely, this meant it was not possible to complete all tasks. The 2020 report is structured in the same order as the ToRs. Note that ToR E was not addressed while ToR G is reported in WKEMBYC (2020). All data submissions were requested via a formal WGBYC/ICES data call (Annex 6: below). The data call requested data on fishing effort, monitoring effort and PETS (protected, endangered, and threatened species of marine mammals, seabirds, reptiles, and fish) bycatch incidents in 2018. 19 of the 24 countries that contacted (18 ICES countries and 6 Mediterranean non-ICES countries) responded. WGBYC did not accept data brought to the meeting, but where problems were found during assessments with country submissions, updated versions were accepted. The quality and scope of Member States (MS) reports on the implementation of Regulation 812/2004 (cetacean bycatch) during 2018 remain varied (ToR A). Most countries have relied on monitoring through their DCF sampling programmes rather than implementing dedicated ob-server programmes. This means that métiers that pose the greatest risk of cetacean bycatch are generally under-sampled and bycatch is underestimated. Regulation 812/2004 was repealed and replaced in June 2019 by the Technical Conservation Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1241) and PETS bycatch monitoring is further implemented through the EU-MAP (Regula-tion (EU) 2017/1004). For 2018, data received through the WGBYC data call amounted to 82 cetaceans (5 species); 175 seals (4 species), 696 birds (at least 22 species); 37 644 elasmobranchs (at least 49 species); 2061 teleost fish (9 species) and 134 turtles (at least 2 species). Equivalent data from non-EU countries was also received from the USA and Iceland. Bycatch of marine mammals was observed in all ecoregions and several gears including gillnets, traps, longlines, and trawls. Seabirds were by-caught in most ecoregions, mainly in nets and longlines. In 2018, bycaught marine turtles were recorded mostly in set nets and trawls in the Mediterranean and in longlines in the Azores. High bycatch rates were observed for some elasmobranch species which are of conservation concern, particularly in trawl gears in the Celtic Sea, the Greater North Sea and Western Mediterranean, and nets in the Celtic Sea. In the US Northwest Atlantic, the gear of most concern are set nets for marine mammals and sea turtles. The gears of most concern in Iceland are set nets (birds and marine mammals) and longlines (birds). Eight countries also contributed numbers of bycaught stranded cetaceans. Bycatch was the predominant cause of death of common dolphins stranded in the Bay of Biscay and Channel. Member states compliance with the ‘pinger’ requirements of Regulation 812/2004 is difficult to gauge from the submitted reports due to reporting inconsistencies and incomplete information (ToR B). Only the United Kingdom appears to comply fully, reporting that all relevant vessels are equipped with “DDD” pingers used under a derogation and there is active enforcement in place. But in general, there has been little progress in the mitigation of cetacean bycatch and the effectiveness of pingers appears to vary among fishing métiers and geographical areas. WGBYC continues to have insufficient data to examine bycatch rates according to pinger use within their database.
KW - Bycatch
KW - Fishing effort
KW - Protected species
KW - Greather North Sea
KW - Bay of Biscay
KW - Iberian waters
KW - Elasmobranchs
KW - Marine mammals
KW - Seabirds
U2 - 10.17895/ices.pub.7471
DO - 10.17895/ices.pub.7471
M3 - Commissioned report
T3 - ICES scientific reports
BT - Working group on bycatch of protected species (WGBYC 2020)
PB - International council for the exploration of the sea (ICES)/Conseil international pour l'exploration de la mer (CIEM)
CY - Copenhagen
ER -