Abstract
It is generally found that workers are more inclined to accept a job that is located farther away from home if they have the ability to work from home one day a week or more (telecommuting). Such findings inform us about the effectiveness of telecommuting policies that try to alleviate congestion and transport related emissions, but they also stress that the geography of labour markets is changing due to information technology. We argue that estimates of the effect of working from home on commuting time may be biased because of sorting based on residential- and commuting preferences. In this paper we investigate the relationship between telecommuting and commuting time, controlling for preference based sorting. We use 7 waves of data from the Dutch Labour Supply Panel and show that on average telecommuters have higher marginal cost of one-way commuting time, compared to non-telecommuters. We estimate the effect of telecommuting on commuting time using a fixed-effects approach and we show that preference based sorting biases cross-sectional results upwards. This suggests that the bias due to sorting based on residential preferences is strongest. Working from home allows people to accept 5 percent longer commuting times on average, and every additional 8 hours of working from home are associated with 3.5 percent longer commuting times.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Annals of Regional Science |
Volume | First Online |
Early online date | 5 Jul 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 5 Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- Telecommuting
- Commuting time
- Preference-based sorting
- Fixed effects