TY - GEN
T1 - "Work with the god"
T2 - Colloquium: Ritual Dynamics in Late Antiquity
AU - Anderson, Ralph Thomas
PY - 2021/7/16
Y1 - 2021/7/16
N2 - Xenophon opens his 'Cavalry Commander' with an injunction to the prospective commander first to seek the help of the gods (before he even procures, let alone trains, either horses or men) and closes it with an explanation of why he has laced his deeply practical advice with exhortations to "work with the god." Modern interpreters have stumbled over this blending of piety and practicality. Some, like Delbrück and, more recently, J. K. Anderson, have seen the blend as impossible, and decided that the rational strategos must have been skilled in circumventing the superstitious impediments placed in his path by irrational soothsayers. Omens, according to them, might be useful in bolstering the morale of the uneducated and superstitious rank and file, but could play no part in serious military planning. Scholarship over the last 40 years or so has been more sympathetic to military divination, and has granted it a significant role in Greek military planning. However, emphasis is often placed on the conflict between the demands of the tactical situation and the dictates of religion. This tendency manifests itself in the form of remarks upon the piety of the Greeks in withdrawing from apparently successful advances simply because of unfavourable omens. This paper offers readings of selected passages in Xenophon that suggest that, on the contrary, divination did not stand in opposition to rational battle-planning, but in fact facilitated it by providing a means of synthesising features of the tactical setting, including not only known elements but also those merely suspected or feared.
AB - Xenophon opens his 'Cavalry Commander' with an injunction to the prospective commander first to seek the help of the gods (before he even procures, let alone trains, either horses or men) and closes it with an explanation of why he has laced his deeply practical advice with exhortations to "work with the god." Modern interpreters have stumbled over this blending of piety and practicality. Some, like Delbrück and, more recently, J. K. Anderson, have seen the blend as impossible, and decided that the rational strategos must have been skilled in circumventing the superstitious impediments placed in his path by irrational soothsayers. Omens, according to them, might be useful in bolstering the morale of the uneducated and superstitious rank and file, but could play no part in serious military planning. Scholarship over the last 40 years or so has been more sympathetic to military divination, and has granted it a significant role in Greek military planning. However, emphasis is often placed on the conflict between the demands of the tactical situation and the dictates of religion. This tendency manifests itself in the form of remarks upon the piety of the Greeks in withdrawing from apparently successful advances simply because of unfavourable omens. This paper offers readings of selected passages in Xenophon that suggest that, on the contrary, divination did not stand in opposition to rational battle-planning, but in fact facilitated it by providing a means of synthesising features of the tactical setting, including not only known elements but also those merely suspected or feared.
KW - Divination
KW - Greek warfare
KW - Greek religion
KW - Xenophon
KW - Herodotus
KW - Socrates
KW - Relational reasoning
KW - David Zeitlyn
KW - Martin Holbraad
KW - Rosalind Shaw
UR - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315449487
UR - https://discover.libraryhub.jisc.ac.uk/search?isn=9781138212992&rn=1
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85115928676
U2 - 10.4324/9781315449487-3-4
DO - 10.4324/9781315449487-3-4
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9781138212992
SN - 9781032041728
T3 - Routledge monographs in classical studies
SP - 84
EP - 108
BT - Divination and knowledge in Greco-Roman antiquity
A2 - Addey, Crystal
PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
CY - Abingdon, Oxon
Y2 - 3 June 2015
ER -