Abstract
This article reviews the theoretical framework and empirical, evidence for the :hypothesised relationship between self-blame attributions;and psychological adjustment. In doing so, an argument is presented that poses: an alternative interpretation to that which is widely accepted regarding the complex relationship between blame attributions, perceived control, self-esteem, and recovery. A number of fundamental issues concerning the assumptions underlying Janoff-Bulman's model are identified and explored. In particular, attention is given to the importance of distinguishing perceived control from likelihood of recurrence, and perceived control from outcome expectancy. Finally, the possibility that attributions;may not play as fundamental a role in adjustment as first thought is considered, and. future,lines of enquiry are identified.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 18-31 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Current Psychology |
Volume | 18 |
Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Keywords
- SELF-BLAME
- MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT
- LEARNED HELPLESSNESS
- CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS
- THREATENING EVENTS
- PERCEIVED CONTROL
- CRIME VICTIMS
- BREAST-CANCER
- RAPE