Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament

Luke Edward Rendell, R. Boyd, Daniel Cownden, M. Enquist, K. Eriksson, M. W. Feldman, Laurel Fogarty, S. Ghirlanda, T. Lillicrap, Kevin Neville Laland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social learning (learning through observation or interaction with other individuals) is widespread in nature and is central to the remarkable success of humanity, yet it remains unclear why copying is profitable and how to copy most effectively. To address these questions, we organized a computer tournament in which entrants submitted strategies specifying how to use social learning and its asocial alternative (for example, trial-and-error learning) to acquire adaptive behavior in a complex environment. Most current theory predicts the emergence of mixed strategies that rely on some combination of the two types of learning. In the tournament, however, strategies that relied heavily on social learning were found to be remarkably successful, even when asocial information was no more costly than social information. Social learning proved advantageous because individuals frequently demonstrated the highest-payoff behavior in their repertoire, inadvertently filtering information for copiers. The winning strategy (discountmachine) relied nearly exclusively on social learning and weighted information according to the time since acquisition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-213
Number of pages6
JournalScience
Volume328
Issue number5975
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2010

Keywords

  • CULTURAL-EVOLUTION
  • INFORMATION
  • TRANSMISSION
  • ENVIRONMENT
  • ANIMALS
  • PARADOX
  • HUMANS
  • RULES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this