Whether and where to give

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective altruists recommend that we give large sums to charity, but by far their more central message is that we give effectively, i.e., to whatever charities would do the most good per dollar donated. In this paper, I’ll assume that it’s not wrong not to give bigger, but will explore to what extent it may well nonetheless be wrong not to give better. The main claim I’ll argue for here is that in many cases it would be wrong of you to give a sum of money to charities that do less good than others you could have given to instead, even if it would not have been wrong of you not to give the money to any charity at all. I assume that all the charities under discussion here do positive good overall, do not cause harm, do not infringe rights, etc. What makes my main claim here particularly interesting is that it is inconsistent with what appears to be a fairly common assumption in the ethics of giving, according to which if it is not wrong of you to keep some sum money for yourself, then it is likewise not wrong of you to donate it to any particular charity you choose. Roughly: if it’s up to you whether to donate the money, it’s also up to you where to donate the money. I challenge this common assumption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-95
JournalPhilosophy and Public Affairs
Volume44
Issue number1
Early online date22 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whether and where to give'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this