What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance

Jessica Hogan*, Charles Raymond Warren, Michael Simpson, Darren McCauley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Community ownership of wind energy has been found to increase acceptance, but the reasons for this are poorly understood. Here, we compare different communities’ attitudes towards local onshore wind energy projects in order to gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics of ownership which are conducive to community acceptance. Using a postal survey in Scotland (n = 318), we compared three communities with varying degrees of ownership regarding their (1) support for the local wind project; (2) perceptions of energy justice; (3) perceived impacts; and (4) ownership and benefit preferences. One-way ANOVAs and the Potential for Conflict Index2 identified that residents in the two communities with a degree of ownership were more associated with greater acceptance, processes, and outcomes (i.e. more just and inclusive development processes and more fairly distributed benefits and impacts), than residents living near the privately-owned development. Additionally, we provide evidence that a co-operative can achieve similar acceptance and energy justice as a fully community-owned project. Overall, the results indicate that policymakers should take seriously the connection between the tenets of energy justice and ownership models in their policy and planning efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Article number113257
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume171
Early online date27 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Community
  • Wind energy
  • Acceptance
  • Energy justice
  • Benefits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this