Abstract
The essay reflects on the ‘material thinness’ of the ‘bubble’, of the human social reality in comparison to the hugeness of the observable universe. Second, I distinguish between the biosphere as a space on the Earth surface where DNA-based life thrives, on the one hand, and the social reality (semiosphere), on the other; the latter generated solely by humans and their social use of language. On this basis, I propose that while most natural sciences deal with the entire material reality, the purview of the social sciences and the humanities is limited to the human semiosphere only. A conscious realization of the fact appears to put many human pursuits in a better perspective.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 8 |
| Pages (from-to) | 54-62 |
| Journal | Revista de Etnologie şi Culturologie |
| Volume | XXIV |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- Biosphere
- Earth
- Entropy
- Humanities
- Material reality
- Natural sciences
- Research
- Semiosphere
- Social reality
- Social sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What do we study when we study the world?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Chto my izuchaem, izuchaia mir?
Kamusella, T. D., 2015, In: Vek globalizatsii. 8, 1, p. 52-65Translated title of the contribution :What We Study When We Study the World? Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver