Viewing distance affects how the presence of inedible models influence the benefit of masquerade

John Skelhorn*, Graeme D. Ruxton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Masquerading prey closely resemble inedible objects found in the same locality. These animals gain protection from their predators by causing their predators to misclassify them as the inedible 'models' that they appear to resemble. We recently demonstrated that predators are more likely to misclassify masquerading prey as their models when masqueraders are viewed in isolation from their models than when they are viewed simultaneously with examples of their models. Using domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) as predators and the twig-mimicking caterpillars of the Early Thorn Moth (Selenia dentaria) as prey, we tested whether this effect was influenced by the relative orientations of models and masqueraders; and the distance from which models and masqueraders could be viewed simultaneously. We found no effect of orientation, but that the cost to masqueraders of being viewed simultaneously with an example of the model declined as the distance between the model and masquerader increased. These results are interpreted in terms of animal cognition, and their implications for the evolutionary ecology of masquerade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-455
Number of pages15
JournalEvolutionary Ecology
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Anti-predator defence
  • Camouflage
  • Caterpillar
  • Crypsis
  • Disguise
  • Predation
  • MENTAL ROTATION
  • CRYPSIS
  • PREY
  • MIMICRY
  • CATERPILLAR
  • CAMOUFLAGE
  • PREDATORS
  • SELECTION
  • EVOLUTION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Viewing distance affects how the presence of inedible models influence the benefit of masquerade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this