Abstract
Monetary velocity declines as economies grow. We argue that this is due to the process of structural transformation - the shift of workers from agricultural to non-agricultural production associated with rising income. A calibrated, two-sector model of structural transformation with monetary and non-monetary trade accurately generates the long run monetary velocity of the US between 1869 and 2013 as well as the velocity of a panel of 92 countries between 1980 and 2010. Three lessons arise from our analysis: 1) Developments in agriculture, rather than non-agriculture, are key in driving monetary velocity; 2) Inflationary policies are disproportionately more costly in richer than in poorer countries; and 3) Nominal prices and inflation rates are not 'always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon': the composition of output influences money demand and hence the secular trends of price levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | St Andrews |
| Publisher | University of St Andrews |
| Pages | 1-44 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Jul 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Publisher | University of St Andrews |
| No. | 1610 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0962-4031 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2055-303X |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Structural transformation
- Monetary shares
- Velocity
- Agricultural productivity
- Non-monetary exchange
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Velocity in the long run: money and structural transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver