Validity of willingness to pay measures under preference uncertainty

Carola Braun, Katrin Rehdanz, Ulrich Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


Recent studies in the marketing literature developed a new method for eliciting willingness to pay (WTP) with an open-ended elicitation format: the Range-WTP method. In contrast to the traditional approach of eliciting WTP as a single value (Point-WTP), Range-WTP explicitly allows for preference uncertainty in responses. The aim of this paper is to apply Range-WTP to the domain of contingent valuation and to test for its theoretical validity and robustness in comparison to the Point-WTP. Using data from two novel large-scale surveys on the perception of solar radiation management (SRM), a little-known technique for counteracting climate change, we compare the performance of both methods in the field. In addition to the theoretical validity (i.e. the degree to which WTP values are consistent with theoretical expectations), we analyse the test-retest reliability and stability of our results over time. Our evidence suggests that the Range-WTP method clearly outperforms the Point-WTP method.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS One
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of willingness to pay measures under preference uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this