Validation of a conceptual assessment tool for E&M II

Qing X. Ryan, Cecilia Astolfi, Charles Baily, Steven J. Pollock

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As part of an ongoing project to investigate student learning in upper-division electrodynamics (E&M II), the PER research group at the University of Colorado Boulder has developed a tool to assess student conceptual understanding: the CURrENT (Colorado UppeR-division ElectrodyNamics Test). The result is an open-ended post-test diagnostic with 6 multi-part questions, an optional 3-question pretest, and an accompanying grading rubric. This instrument is motivated in part by our faculty-consensus learning goals, and is intended to help measure the effectiveness of transformed pedagogy. In addition, it provides insights into student thinking and student difficulties in the covered topical areas. In this paper, we present preliminary measures of the validity and reliability of the instrument and scoring rubric. These include expert validation and student interviews, inter-rater reliability measures, and classical test statistics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2014 Physics Education Research Conference
EditorsPaula V. Engelhardt, Alice D. Churukian, Dyan L. Jones
PublisherAmerican Association of Physics Teachers
Pages231-234
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)978-1-931024-23-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2015
EventPhysics Education Research Conference 2014 - University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Duration: 30 Jul 201431 Jul 2014

Publication series

NamePERC Proceedings
PublisherAmerican Association of Physics Teachers
ISSN (Print)1539-9028
ISSN (Electronic)2377-2379

Conference

ConferencePhysics Education Research Conference 2014
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityMinneapolis, MN
Period30/07/1431/07/14

Keywords

  • Physics education research
  • Electromagnetism
  • Course transformation
  • Assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of a conceptual assessment tool for E&M II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this