Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust: Male Facial Width and Trustworthiness

Michael Robert Stirrat, David Ian Perrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Decisions about whom to trust are biased by stable facial traits such as attractiveness, similarity to kin, and perceived trustworthiness. Research addressing the validity of facial trustworthiness or its basis in facial features is scarce, and the results have been inconsistent. We measured male trustworthiness operationally in trust games in which participants had options to collaborate for mutual financial gain or to exploit for greater personal gain. We also measured facial (bizygomatic) width (scaled for face height) because this is a sexually dimorphic, testosterone-linked trait predictive of male aggression. We found that men with greater facial width were more likely to exploit the trust of others and that other players were less likely to trust male counterparts with wide rather than narrow faces (independent of their attractiveness). Moreover, manipulating this facial-width ratio with computer graphics controlled attributions of trustworthiness, particularly for subordinate female evaluators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-354
JournalPsychological Science
Volume21
Issue number3
Early online date16 Feb 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust: Male Facial Width and Trustworthiness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this