Abstract
Suboptimal diagnostics for pulmonary tuberculosis drive the use of the so-called trial of antibiotics, a course of broad-spectrum antibiotics without activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is given to patients who are mycobacteriology negative but symptomatic, with the aim of distinguishing pulmonary tuberculosis from bacterial lower respiratory tract infection. The underlying assumption—that patients with lower respiratory tract infection will improve, whereas those with pulmonary tuberculosis will not—has an unclear evidence base for such a widely used intervention (at least 26·5 million courses are prescribed per year). We aimed to collate available evidence on the diagnostic performance of the trial of antibiotics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1089-1098 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Lancet Infectious Diseases |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 18 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of broad-spectrum antibiotics for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Derek James Sloan
- School of Medicine - Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Infectious Diseases
- Infection and Global Health Division
Person: Academic