TY - JOUR
T1 - Using the PCI in the identification of fatigue following treatment for head and neck cancer
AU - Rogers, Simon N.
AU - Semple, Cherith J.
AU - Humphris, Gerald Michael
AU - Lowe, Derek
AU - Kanatas, Anastasios
N1 - Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0215-36047).
PY - 2020/11/26
Y1 - 2020/11/26
N2 - Fatigue has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and HRQOL for head and neck cancer patients who raise the issue of fatigue on the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI), at their review consultation. Eight consultants were randomised to use the PCIas part of a cluster-controlled trial. Patients also completed the UW-QoLv4 (University of Washington Quality of Life), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQolGroup) and Distress Thermometer. There were 140 patients who attended clinics at a median (IQR) of 108 (70-165) days after the end of treatment. The PCI item ‘fatigue’ was the 6th most commonly selected, by 29% (40). Those with advanced tumours were more likely (36% 30/83 Vs 18% 10/56, p=0.02) to have selected the item, as were those treated with radiotherapy +/-chemotherapy (39% 34/87 Vs 11% 6/53, p<0.001). The PCI fatigue group reported significantly worse overall QOL, social-emotional and physical function composite scores, distress thermometer, and EQ-5D. PCI-fatigue was common in those with sleeping, nausea, mood, depression, mobility, breathing and energy level concerns. In conclusion, given the problems associated with fatigue, it is appropriate to screen and seek interventions that might help patient address this.
AB - Fatigue has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and HRQOL for head and neck cancer patients who raise the issue of fatigue on the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI), at their review consultation. Eight consultants were randomised to use the PCIas part of a cluster-controlled trial. Patients also completed the UW-QoLv4 (University of Washington Quality of Life), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQolGroup) and Distress Thermometer. There were 140 patients who attended clinics at a median (IQR) of 108 (70-165) days after the end of treatment. The PCI item ‘fatigue’ was the 6th most commonly selected, by 29% (40). Those with advanced tumours were more likely (36% 30/83 Vs 18% 10/56, p=0.02) to have selected the item, as were those treated with radiotherapy +/-chemotherapy (39% 34/87 Vs 11% 6/53, p<0.001). The PCI fatigue group reported significantly worse overall QOL, social-emotional and physical function composite scores, distress thermometer, and EQ-5D. PCI-fatigue was common in those with sleeping, nausea, mood, depression, mobility, breathing and energy level concerns. In conclusion, given the problems associated with fatigue, it is appropriate to screen and seek interventions that might help patient address this.
KW - Fatigue
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Intervention
KW - Prompt list
KW - Health related quality of life
KW - Patient Concerns Inventory
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0901-5027
VL - In Press
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
ER -