Untangling the authority of external experts in the corporate implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Marisa McVey*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human (UNGPs) explicitly ask corporations to rely on “external expertise” for policy guidance, human rights due diligence (HRDD), and remedy. The broad conceptualization of expertise in the UNGPs signifies an amorphous, neutral, and largely unregulated community of consultants, human rights institutions, NGOs, impact assessors, and auditors (among other actors). I argue that external experts exert significant governance authority in the business and human rights space. Through empirical analysis of experts orbiting two multinational corporations, I identify experts as knowledge providers, diplomats, critics, and legitimizers in the corporate implementation of the UNGPs. In doing so, this work adds nuanced political dimensions to expert authority in business and human rights, offering evidence of its manifestations and limitations. Finally, I advance some considerations and suggestions for future research, particularly vital in the context of incoming mandatory HRDD legislation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)620-638
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Human Rights
    Volume22
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Untangling the authority of external experts in the corporate implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this