Abstract
This article problematises the role of the state in what is claimed to be the 'flagship' of the South African Spatial Development Initiative (SDI) programme, the Maputo Development Corridor (MDC). The purpose is to assess to what extent the state is best understood as a 'transmission belt' for transnational capital or as a 'facilitator' for development. The study reveals several flaws in the MDC which reinforce the role of the state as a transmission belt for transnational capital, rather than as a facilitator for development. For instance, the neo-liberal market fundamentalism and big-bang approach inherent in the MDC spells 'jobless growth'. Similarly, the notion that 'good governance is less government', implies that the state is to a large extent reduced to an 'investment promotion agency'. Having said this, the MDC does contain several novel and positive features, and its problematic aspects can be overcome through some strategic changes in the MDC approach. These may be summarised as a heavier focus on 'development', a more pro-active state, and more comprehensive and inclusive governance structures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 675-695 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF MODERN AFRICAN STUDIES |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transmission belt for transnational capital or facilitaton for development? Problematising the role of the state in the Maputo development corridor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver