Abstract
In recent decades, UK public-sector housing has increasingly been problematised, with government solutions focusing on modernising the sector by transferring ownership of the housing from the public to the voluntary sector through stock transfer. This promises to transform the organisation of social housing by devolving control from local government to housing organisations located within, and governed by, the communities in which they are based. The Scottish Executive's national housing policy of community ownership is the epitome of this governmental rationale par excellence. Drawing upon empirical research on the 2003 Glasgow housing stock transfer, this paper argues that, whilst community ownership is underpinned by governmental rationales that seek to establish community as the new territory of social housing governance, the realisation of these political ambitions has been marred by emergent central-local conflict. Paradoxically, the fragmentation of social housing through the break-up of municipal provision, co-exists with continued political centralisation within the state apparatus.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 183-196 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Space and Polity |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 2 Jul 2008 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Social housing
- Community ownership
- Tenant empowerment
- Centralisation
- Devolved governance
- Realist governmentality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transforming Scotland’s public sector housing through community ownership: the reterritorialisation of housing governance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver