Transforming (Private) Rights through (Public) International Law: Readings on a ‘Strange and Painful Odyssey’ in the PCIJ Mavrommatis Case

Michelle Leanne Burgis-Kasthala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Straddling both the centres of (European) power and the shifting dynamics of the post-Ottoman world in a quest to guarantee private rights through public international legal redress, the PCIJ Mavrommatis case provides a rich resource for interrogating the extent to which international law during the League period could speak for voices on the edge of empire. In this article, historical consideration of the regimes of empire and Mandate form the backdrop to an exploration into how international legal discourse (re)configured the relationship between the core and the periphery, especially for those peoples awaiting the promise of self-determination and sovereignty. The figure of a lone Greek investor and his dashed hopes in the newly created Palestine Mandate is the backdrop to this tail of ever-shifting interpretations of public and private rights, of speech as well as silence before and beyond the Peace Palace.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-897
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date3 Nov 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transforming (Private) Rights through (Public) International Law: Readings on a ‘Strange and Painful Odyssey’ in the PCIJ Mavrommatis Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this