Abstract
This paper
describes a recent project by Research Libraries UK to analyse the
‘collective collection’ of its member libraries, in order to understand
the implications for the community of a collectively-managed print
resource in the future. It discusses the work of OCLC Research in using
the OCLC WorldCat database for this analysis, taking account of
inaccurate data matching and its effects, and considers how the RLUK
analysis feeds in to broader work across the UK, led by Jisc, to create a
UK National Bibliographic Knowledgebase. It compares the findings of
the OCLC Research study to those of an earlier similar analysis of the
collective Association of Research Libraries collection in North
America. The governance and funding complexity of the UK is described to
account for the challenges inherent in taking a national approach to
the problems of managing a collective collection. The UK Research
Reserve is described as an example of a shared print approach, thus far
only applied to journals, which has over the last 10 years been a
successful initiative for a number of participant libraries in allowing
them to free up shelf space by removing duplicate holdings. The
collective collection work of a subset of RLUK, the White Rose
University Consortium in Yorkshire, is described as an exemplar of an
implementation of the findings of the RLUK-wide study within a regional
context.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 367-374 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Nov 2017 |
Keywords
- RLUK
- Jisc
- OCLC
- WorldCat
- COPAC
- Sconul
- UK National Bibliographic Knowledgebase
- 'Collective collection'
- HathiTrust
- UK Research Reserve
- Union catalogues
- White Rose University Consortium
- GreenGlass
- E-books