Abstract
In this brief concluding chapter of the book’s second part, I will offer a couple of warnings or ‘caveats’ before moving on to the more fundamental discussion of the merits and demerits of using technology as a sliver bullet against terrorism in the third part. First of all, I argue that the introduction of available technologies, especially off-the-shelf solutions, has been a rather slow and tedious one. Secondly, I argue that all the security measures discussed do not completely eradicate the threat posed by terrorists: they rather displace it to areas just outside the defence perimeters. And thirdly, I point out that some attacks simply cannot be prevented as long as we are not prepared to deploy plenty of sniffers, scanners and other detection devices all over the city.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 143-146 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 1613-5113 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2363-9466 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Function creep
- Knife attacks
- Threat displacement
- Threat eradication
- ‘Landside’ attacks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Threat displacement instead of threat eradication: Some concluding caveats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver