Thinking about the Law of Unintended Consequences

Rashmi Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The United State’s now-not-so-covert drone based program targeting Al Qaeda (AQ) and Taliban commanders based in Pakistan’s inhospitable and hostile Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FETA) has been operational since 2004. However, US air strikes in Pakistan’s tribal belt have steadily escalated over the past three years. The US has claimed that these attacks have successfully decimated core Al Qaeda and Taliban leadership. This past September alone the US military conducted 26 drone strikes in Pakistan, racking up a figure that the BBC is calling the "highest monthly total for the past six years". Not only do these steadily escalating drone strikes raise some pertinent questions about US/NATO successes claimed under the rubric of the Global War on Terror (or if you prefer, the Overseas Contingency Operations) but they also shed some light on the deteriorating political situation in Pakistan.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-73
JournalJournal of Terrorism Research
Issue number1
Early online date13 Oct 2010
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking about the Law of Unintended Consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this