TY - BOOK
T1 - The un-Polish Poland
T2 - 1989 and the illusion of regained historical continuity
AU - Kamusella, Tomasz Dominik
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - The fall of communism and the breakup of the Soviet bloc are duly reflected in the semi-official sobriquet ‘Third Republic’ (Trzecia Rzeczpospolita) which is now in ubiquitous use in today’s Poland. Communist Poland, or the People’s Republic of Poland (Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa, commonly abbreviated as the PRL), is excluded from this numbering on the account of having been a ‘foreign and non-Polish’ (that is, Soviet or ‘Russian’) imposition. The year 1989 is seen as a clear point-break that allowed the Poles and their country to regain a ‘natural historical continuity’ with the ‘Second Republic,’ as interwar Poland is commonly referred to in the current Polish master narrative. In this pattern of thinking about the past, the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania (nowadays roughly coterminous with Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia’s Kaliningrad Region and Ukraine) is seen as the ‘First Republic.’ However, in spite of this ‘politics of memory’ (Geschichtspolitik) – regarding its borders, institutions, law, language, or ethnic and social makeup – present-day Poland, in reality, is the direct successor to and the continuation of communist Poland. Ironically, today’s Poland is very different, in all the aforementioned aspects, from the First and Second Republics. Hence, contemporary Poland is quite non-Polish, indeed, from the perspective of Polishness defined as a historical (that is, legal, social, cultural, ethnic and political) continuity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and interwar Poland.
AB - The fall of communism and the breakup of the Soviet bloc are duly reflected in the semi-official sobriquet ‘Third Republic’ (Trzecia Rzeczpospolita) which is now in ubiquitous use in today’s Poland. Communist Poland, or the People’s Republic of Poland (Polska Rzeczpospolita Ludowa, commonly abbreviated as the PRL), is excluded from this numbering on the account of having been a ‘foreign and non-Polish’ (that is, Soviet or ‘Russian’) imposition. The year 1989 is seen as a clear point-break that allowed the Poles and their country to regain a ‘natural historical continuity’ with the ‘Second Republic,’ as interwar Poland is commonly referred to in the current Polish master narrative. In this pattern of thinking about the past, the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania (nowadays roughly coterminous with Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia’s Kaliningrad Region and Ukraine) is seen as the ‘First Republic.’ However, in spite of this ‘politics of memory’ (Geschichtspolitik) – regarding its borders, institutions, law, language, or ethnic and social makeup – present-day Poland, in reality, is the direct successor to and the continuation of communist Poland. Ironically, today’s Poland is very different, in all the aforementioned aspects, from the First and Second Republics. Hence, contemporary Poland is quite non-Polish, indeed, from the perspective of Polishness defined as a historical (that is, legal, social, cultural, ethnic and political) continuity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and interwar Poland.
KW - Poland-Lithuania
KW - interwar Poland
KW - communist Poland
KW - Politics of history
KW - Language politics
KW - memory politics
KW - post-1989 Poland
KW - Historical continuity
KW - Inclsuiveness
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Nationalism
KW - National master narrative
UR - https://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9783319600352
UR - http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/50018215?style=html&title=un-Polish%20Poland%2C%201989%20and%20the%20illusion%20of%20regained
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-60036-9
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-60036-9
M3 - Book
SN - 9783319600352
SN - 9783319867649
T3 - Palgrave pivot
BT - The un-Polish Poland
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
CY - Cham
ER -