Abstract
This paper investigates whether moral status talk gets us anywhere in our search for answers to questions in the ethics of marginal cases. I consider the usefulness of moral status talk first on the assumption that an individual's possession of moral status is not a further fact about that individual, and then on the assumption that it is. Finally, I offer an expressivistic interpretation of moral status talk. In each case, I argue that such talk conveys nothing that cannot be conveyed more clearly in other words. My conclusion is that we should stop using moral status and its cognates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-104 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Status of Moral Status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver