Abstract
This paper investigates whether moral status talk gets us anywhere in our search for answers to questions in the ethics of marginal cases. I consider the usefulness of moral status talk first on the assumption that an individual's possession of moral status is not a further fact about that individual, and then on the assumption that it is. Finally, I offer an expressivistic interpretation of moral status talk. In each case, I argue that such talk conveys nothing that cannot be conveyed more clearly in other words. My conclusion is that we should stop using moral status and its cognates.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-104 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
Volume | 92 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2011 |