The ownership of assets by place-based community organisations: political rationales, geographies of social impact and future research agendas

Tom Moore, Kim McKee

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article calls for a more nuanced understanding of the links between the motivations, trajectories and policy environments of community asset organisations and the geographies of their social impact. While potential for the ownership of physical assets by place-based community organisations can be found in new localism powers in all four jurisdictions of the UK, there may be differences in policy articulation and implementation that enable or limit the social benefits community asset organisations are thought to deliver. Furthermore, community assets are premised on their intrinsic tie and value to place, with social cohesion, communal mobilisation and identification of mutual interest thought to be at their heart. This article reviews research in this field set in relation to recent policy developments, and identifies an important need to better understand how the personal and social geographies of impact are delivered in, and influenced by, different spatial contexts and political frameworks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalSocial Policy and Society
    Volume13
    Issue number4
    Early online date24 Oct 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    Keywords

    • Third sector
    • Civil society
    • Self-help
    • Localism
    • Voluntary sector

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ownership of assets by place-based community organisations: political rationales, geographies of social impact and future research agendas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this