The origins and intentions of the Anglo-Persian Agreement 1919: a reassessment

Philip Grobien*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Anglo-Persian Agreement has never been anything other than controversial. Outwardly, an agreement negotiated by traitors in secrecy, it was to give the British government control over the administration, finance, and military in Iran after the First World War. Much maligned as a plan for a protectorate, the criticism has largely obscured the narrative which shows that this agreement can be seen as a logical conclusion to policies followed by Iran and Britain which had begun in the previous century. In addition, it is likely that the convictions and motivations of the architects of the agreement have been misjudged. Though by no means seeking to exonerate the culpability of self-serving Iranian politicians who sought this agreement, this article seeks to reassess the origins and negotiations behind the agreement and show that its negotiation had precedent and was of vital need to Iran.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalIran: Journal of British Institute of Persian Studies
VolumeLatest Articles
Early online date2 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Anglo-Persian Agreement
  • Vosuq al-Dowleh
  • Lord Curzon
  • Sir Percy Cox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The origins and intentions of the Anglo-Persian Agreement 1919: a reassessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this