“The Ordinary” in Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper analyses the opposing accounts of ‘the ordinary’ given by Jacques Derrida and Stanley Cavell, beginning with their competing interpretations of J. L. Austin¹s thought on ordinary language. These accounts are presented as mutually critiquing: Derrida¹s deconstructive method poses an effective challenge to Cavell¹s claim that the ordinary is irreducible by further philosophical analysis, while, conversely, Cavell¹s valorisation of the human draws attention to a residual humanity in Derrida¹s text which Derrida cannot account for. The two philosophers’ approaches are, in fact, predicated on each other like the famous Gestalt-image of a vase and two faces: they cannot come into focus at the same time, but one cannot appear without the other to furnish its background.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-260
JournalMinerva: An Internet Journal of Philosophy
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013


Dive into the research topics of '“The Ordinary” in Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this