TY - JOUR
T1 - The nature of culture
T2 - Technological variation in chimpanzee predation on army ants revisited
AU - Schöning, Caspar
AU - Humle, Tatyana
AU - Möbius, Yasmin
AU - McGrew, W. C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank K. Abernethy, P. Bertolani, C. Boesch, S. Bogart, I. Deblauwe, T. Deschner, D. Ellis, A. Fowler, C. Hashimoto, C. Hicks, K. Hunt, K. Jeffrey, J. Mitani, D. Morgan, G. Muhumuza, N. Newton-Fisher, J. Pruetz, V. Reynolds, V. Sommer, Y. Sugiyama, J. Swinkels, C. Tutin, S. Uehara, and M. Wilson for contributing samples and data to this project or for providing valuable comments on the manuscript. CS thanks W. Gotwald Jr. for fruitful discussions on Dorylus (Anomma) taxonomy, the Social Insects Study Group at the Center for Social Evolution at the University of Copenhagen (CSE) for helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript, J. Boomsma for advice, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the CSE, and the Leakey Foundation for financial support. TH thanks the Kyoto University Primate Research Institute, Japan, in particular T. Matsuzawa, for logistical support and advice and G. Yamakoshi and G. Ohashi for data contribution, and the Leakey Foundation and an NRSA Postdoctoral Training Fellowship (No. MH068906) for financial support. YM thanks the Swiss Research Centre in Abidjan for logistic support. The research in Taï National Park was supported by the Max Planck Society. WM thanks L. Salwiczek for critical comments on the manuscript and the National Science Foundation (HOMINID Program), Revealing Hominid Origins Inititative (RHOI) for financial support.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/2/13
Y1 - 2008/2/13
N2 - Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) predation on army ants (Dorylus, subgenus Anomma) is an impressive example of skillful use of elementary technology, and it has been suggested to reflect cultural differences among chimpanzee communities. Alternatively, the observed geographic diversity in army-ant-eating may represent local behavioral responses of the chimpanzees to the anti-predator traits of the army ant species present at the different sites. We examined assemblages of available prey species, their behavior and morphology, consumption by chimpanzees, techniques employed, and tool lengths at 14 sites in eastern, central, and western Africa. Where army ants are eaten, tool length and concomitant technique are a function of prey type. Epigaeically foraging species with aggressive workers that inflict painful bites are harvested with longer tools and usually by the "pull-through" technique; species foraging in leaf-litter with less aggressive workers that inflict less painful bites are harvested with short tools and by the "direct-mouthing" technique. However, prey species characteristics do not explain several differences in army-ant-eating between Bossou (Guinea) and Taï (Ivory Coast), where the same suite of prey species is available and is consumed. Moreover, the absence of army-ant-eating at five sites cannot be explained by the identity of available prey species, as all the species found at these sites are eaten elsewhere. We conclude that some of the observed variation in the predator-prey relationship of chimpanzees and army ants reflects environmental influences driven by the prey, while other variation is not linked to prey characteristics and may be solely sociocultural.
AB - Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) predation on army ants (Dorylus, subgenus Anomma) is an impressive example of skillful use of elementary technology, and it has been suggested to reflect cultural differences among chimpanzee communities. Alternatively, the observed geographic diversity in army-ant-eating may represent local behavioral responses of the chimpanzees to the anti-predator traits of the army ant species present at the different sites. We examined assemblages of available prey species, their behavior and morphology, consumption by chimpanzees, techniques employed, and tool lengths at 14 sites in eastern, central, and western Africa. Where army ants are eaten, tool length and concomitant technique are a function of prey type. Epigaeically foraging species with aggressive workers that inflict painful bites are harvested with longer tools and usually by the "pull-through" technique; species foraging in leaf-litter with less aggressive workers that inflict less painful bites are harvested with short tools and by the "direct-mouthing" technique. However, prey species characteristics do not explain several differences in army-ant-eating between Bossou (Guinea) and Taï (Ivory Coast), where the same suite of prey species is available and is consumed. Moreover, the absence of army-ant-eating at five sites cannot be explained by the identity of available prey species, as all the species found at these sites are eaten elsewhere. We conclude that some of the observed variation in the predator-prey relationship of chimpanzees and army ants reflects environmental influences driven by the prey, while other variation is not linked to prey characteristics and may be solely sociocultural.
KW - Army ants
KW - Chimpanzee
KW - Culture
KW - Insectivory
KW - Predation
KW - Tool use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649159656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 18275983
AN - SCOPUS:44649159656
SN - 0047-2484
VL - 55
SP - 48
EP - 59
JO - Journal of Human Evolution
JF - Journal of Human Evolution
IS - 1
ER -