The moral behavior of ethics professors: a replication-extension in German-speaking countries

Philipp Schoenegger, Johannes Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is the relation between ethical reflection and moral behavior? Does professional reflection on ethical issues positively impact moral behaviors? To address these questions, Schwitzgebel and Rust empirically investigated if philosophy professors engaged with ethics on a professional basis behave any morally better or, at least, more consistently with their expressed values than do non-ethicist professors. Findings from their original US-based sample indicated that neither is the case, suggesting that there is no positive influence of ethical reflection on moral action. In the study at hand, we attempted to cross-validate this pattern of results in the German-speaking countries and surveyed 417 professors using a replication-extension research design. Our results indicate a successful replication of the original effect that ethicists do not behave any morally better compared to other academics across the vast majority of normative issues. Yet, unlike the original study, we found mixed results on normative attitudes generally. On some issues, ethicists and philosophers even expressed more lenient attitudes. However, one issue on which ethicists not only held stronger normative attitudes but also reported better corresponding moral behaviors was vegetarianism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-559
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Experimental philosophy
  • Replication-extension
  • Moral attitudes
  • Moral behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The moral behavior of ethics professors: a replication-extension in German-speaking countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this