The Literary Criticism and Compositional Logic of Deuteronomy I-IV

Nathan MacDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the first speech of Moses in Deuteronomy (i 1-iv 40) is not of one piece, and that a clear distinction needs to be recognized between the rhetorical parenesis of chapter iv and the narrative recapitulation in chapters i-iii. This analysis has even proved determinative for scholars interested in the final form of the biblical text, despite the recognition that the chapters are portrayed canonically as Moses's first speech. A lack of substantive thematic connections between the two parts of the speech prevents any attempt to trace unity across the whole. This article argues that the consensus on the literary history of these chapters may be more problematic than commonly thought. Further, it is proposed that common to both the narrative and the parenetic sections of Moses's first speech are the complex interrelationship between the themes of divine presence, human obedience, election and the land.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-224
Number of pages22
JournalVetus Testamentum
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Literary Criticism and Compositional Logic of Deuteronomy I-IV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this