The I in logic

Gillian Russell

doi:10.1111/theo.12543

The I in logic

Gillian Russell^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so-called "essentiality" of the indexical.

Original language	English
Number of pages	21
Journal	Theoria
Volume	Early View
Early online date	16 Jul 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12543
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 16 Jul 2024

Keywords

Demonstratives
Kaplan
Logic

Access to Document

10.1111/theo.12543Licence: CC BY

Russell_2024_Theoria_I-in-logic_CC
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 329 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{5a960c7bb6704db59af2368dae218277,

title = "The I in logic",

abstract = "This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so-called {"}essentiality{"} of the indexical.",

keywords = "Demonstratives, Kaplan, Logic",

author = "Gillian Russell",

year = "2024",

month = jul,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1111/theo.12543",

language = "English",

volume = "Early View",

journal = "Theoria",

issn = "0040-5825",

publisher = "DPHT Stockholm",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The I in logic

AU - Russell, Gillian

PY - 2024/7/16

Y1 - 2024/7/16

N2 - This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so-called "essentiality" of the indexical.

AB - This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so-called "essentiality" of the indexical.

KW - Demonstratives

KW - Kaplan

KW - Logic

U2 - 10.1111/theo.12543

DO - 10.1111/theo.12543

M3 - Article

SN - 0040-5825

VL - Early View

JO - Theoria

JF - Theoria

ER -

The I in logic

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this