Abstract
The Hooded Man Paradox of Eubulides concerns the apparent failure of the substitutivity of identicals in epistemic (and other intentional) contexts. This paper formulates a number of different versions of the paradox and shows how these may be solved using semantics for quantified epistemic logic. In particular, two semantics are given which invalidate substitution, even when designators are involved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 445-67 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Philosophical Logic |
Volume | 31 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
Keywords
- epistemic logic
- Eubulides
- substitution of identicals