Abstract
This paper establishes a Kantian duty against screen overexposure. After defining screen exposure, I adopt a Kantian approach to its morality on the ground that Kant’s notion of duties to oneself easily captures wrongdoing in absence of harm or wrong to others. Then, I draw specifically on Kant’s ‘duties to oneself as an animal being’ to introduce a duty of self-government. This duty is based on the negative causal impact of the activities it regulates on a human being’s mental and physical powers, and, ultimately, on the moral employment of these powers. After doing so, I argue that the duty against screen overexposure is an instance of the duty of self-government. Finally, I consider some objections.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Res Publica |
| Volume | First Online |
| Early online date | 20 Dec 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- Kant
- Duties to oneself
- Screen addiction
- Internet addiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The glowing screen before me and the moral law within me: a Kantian duty against screen overexposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver