TY - JOUR
T1 - The GFDL‐CM4X Climate Model hierarchy, part I
T2 - model description and thermal properties
AU - Griffies, Stephen M.
AU - Adcroft, Alistair
AU - Beadling, Rebecca L.
AU - Bushuk, Mitchell
AU - Chang, Chiung‐Yin
AU - Drake, Henri F.
AU - Dussin, Raphael
AU - Hallberg, Robert W.
AU - Hurlin, William J.
AU - Khatri, Hemant
AU - Krasting, John P.
AU - Lobo, Matthew
AU - MacGilchrist, Graeme A.
AU - Reichl, Brandon G.
AU - Sane, Aakash
AU - Sergienko, Olga
AU - Sonnewald, Maike
AU - Steinberg, Jacob M.
AU - Tesdal, Jan‐Erik
AU - Thomas, Matthew
AU - Turner, Katherine E.
AU - Ward, Marshall L.
AU - Winton, Michael
AU - Zadeh, Niki
AU - Zanna, Laure
AU - Zhang, Rong
AU - Zhang, Wenda
AU - Zhao, Ming
N1 - Funding: A.A. was supported by Award NA18OAR4320123 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
R.B. was supported under NSF Division of Polar Programs Grant NSF2319828.
C.Y.C. was supported by Award NA19OAR4310365 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
H.F.D. was supported by the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship Program, administered by UCAR's Cooperative Programs for the Advancement of Earth System Science (CPAESS) under Award NA18NWS4620043B.
H.K. acknowledges the support from Natural Environment Research Council grants NE/T013494/1 and NE/W001543/1.
M.L. was supported by award NA18OAR4320123 and NA23OAR4320198 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
G.A.M was supported by NSF (PLR-1425989) and UKRI (MR/W013835/1).
A.S. was supported by Schmidt Sciences, LLC under the M2LInES project.
K.E.T acknowledges support from the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) Project under NSF Awards PLR-1425989 and OPP-1936222 and 2332379.
L.Z. was supported by Schmidt Sciences, LLC under the LInES project, NSF grant OCE 1912357 and NOAA CVP NA19OAR4310364.
W.Z. was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number F1240-01(NSF OCE 1912357).
PY - 2025/10/18
Y1 - 2025/10/18
N2 - We present the GFDL‐CM4X (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Climate Model version 4X) coupled climate model hierarchy. The primary application for CM4X is to investigate ocean and sea ice physics as part of a realistic coupled Earth climate model. CM4X utilizes an updated MOM6 (Modular Ocean Model version 6) ocean physics package relative to CM4.0, and there are two members of the hierarchy: one that uses a horizontal grid spacing of 0.25° (referred to as CM4X‐p25) and the other that uses a 0.125° grid (CM4X‐p125). CM4X also refines its atmospheric grid from the nominally 100 km (cubed sphere C96) of CM4.0–50 km (C192). Finally, CM4X simplifies the land model to allow for a more focused study of the role of ocean changes to global mean climate. CM4X‐p125 reaches a global ocean area mean heat flux imbalance of -0.02 W m-2 within θ (150) years in a pre‐industrial simulation, and retains that thermally equilibrated state over the subsequent centuries. This 1850 thermal equilibrium is characterized by roughly 400 ZJ less ocean heat than present‐day, which corresponds to estimates for anthropogenic ocean heat uptake between 1870 and present‐day. CM4X‐p25 approaches its thermal equilibrium only after more than 1000 years, at which time its ocean has roughly 1100 ZJ more heat than its early 21st century ocean initial state. Furthermore, the root‐mean‐square sea surface temperature bias for historical simulations is roughly 20% smaller in CM4X‐p125 relative to CM4X‐p25 (and CM4.0). We offer the mesoscale dominance hypothesis for why CM4X‐p125 shows such favorable thermal equilibration properties.
AB - We present the GFDL‐CM4X (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Climate Model version 4X) coupled climate model hierarchy. The primary application for CM4X is to investigate ocean and sea ice physics as part of a realistic coupled Earth climate model. CM4X utilizes an updated MOM6 (Modular Ocean Model version 6) ocean physics package relative to CM4.0, and there are two members of the hierarchy: one that uses a horizontal grid spacing of 0.25° (referred to as CM4X‐p25) and the other that uses a 0.125° grid (CM4X‐p125). CM4X also refines its atmospheric grid from the nominally 100 km (cubed sphere C96) of CM4.0–50 km (C192). Finally, CM4X simplifies the land model to allow for a more focused study of the role of ocean changes to global mean climate. CM4X‐p125 reaches a global ocean area mean heat flux imbalance of -0.02 W m-2 within θ (150) years in a pre‐industrial simulation, and retains that thermally equilibrated state over the subsequent centuries. This 1850 thermal equilibrium is characterized by roughly 400 ZJ less ocean heat than present‐day, which corresponds to estimates for anthropogenic ocean heat uptake between 1870 and present‐day. CM4X‐p25 approaches its thermal equilibrium only after more than 1000 years, at which time its ocean has roughly 1100 ZJ more heat than its early 21st century ocean initial state. Furthermore, the root‐mean‐square sea surface temperature bias for historical simulations is roughly 20% smaller in CM4X‐p125 relative to CM4X‐p25 (and CM4.0). We offer the mesoscale dominance hypothesis for why CM4X‐p125 shows such favorable thermal equilibration properties.
U2 - 10.1029/2024ms004861
DO - 10.1029/2024ms004861
M3 - Article
SN - 1942-2466
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 58
JO - Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
JF - Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
IS - 10
M1 - e2024MS004861
ER -