The geometry of evolutionary conflict

Petri Tapio Rautiala*, Andy Gardner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conflicts of interest abound not only in human affairs but also in the biological realm. Evolutionary conflict occurs over multiple scales of biological organization, from genetic outlawry within genomes, to sibling rivalry within nuclear families, to collective-action disputes within societies. However, achieving a general understanding of the dynamics and consequences of evolutionary conflict remains an outstanding challenge. Here, we show that a development of R. A. Fisher's classic ‘geometric model’ of adaptation yields novel and surprising insights into the dynamics of evolutionary conflict and resulting maladaptation, including the discoveries that: (i) conflict can drive evolving traits arbitrarily far away from all parties' optima and, indeed, if all mutations are equally likely then contested traits are more often than not driven outwith the zone of actual conflict (hyper-maladaptation); (ii) evolutionary conflicts drive persistent maladaptation of orthogonal, non-contested traits (para-maladaptation); and (iii) modular design greatly ameliorates conflict-driven maladaptation, thereby facilitating major transitions in individuality.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20222423
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences
Volume290
Issue number1992
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Cost of complexity
  • Maladaptation
  • Modularity
  • Major transitions
  • Fisher's geometric model
  • Conflict

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The geometry of evolutionary conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this