The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

MD Hauser, N Chomsky, William Tecumseh Sherman Fitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2314 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1569-1579
Number of pages11
JournalScience
Volume298
Issue number5598
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Nov 2002

Keywords

  • ALARM CALLS
  • MACACA-MULATTA
  • RHESUS-MONKEY
  • SEMANTIC COMMUNICATION
  • CHIMPANZEES KNOW
  • HUMAN INFANTS
  • SPEECH
  • EVOLUTION
  • MACAQUES
  • DISCRIMINATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this