The effectiveness of interprofessional collaborative practice for people living with multimorbidity: a systematic review

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Review question
PICOCS Breakdown:
Population - Multimorbidity - anyone with 2 or more health conditions
Intervention - All types of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPC)
Comparison - No intervention/standard practice with no IPC
Outcomes - Patient and carer defined outcomes (what matters to you), (vs health outcomes defined by others) - improvement which is a quantitative (and statistically/clinically significant) or qualitative improvement, which is sustained for more than 6 months.
Context - Any healthcare setting (not just primary care), any country in the world, Real world settings.
Study Design - All real world pragmatic quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies

Refined Study question:
How does interprofessional collaborative practice within healthcare settings positively and negatively affect outcomes (defined by patients, health care professionals, healthcare managers and policy makers) for people living with multimorbidity when compared to standard healthcare practice?
Original languageEnglish
TypeLiterature Review
Media of outputPDF
PublisherUniversity of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2022

Publication series

NamePROSPERO
PublisherUniversity of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
No.CRD42022358998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of interprofessional collaborative practice for people living with multimorbidity: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this