TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of contrast polarity reversal on face detection
T2 - evidence of perceptual asymmetry from sweep VEP
AU - Liu-Shuang, J.
AU - Ales, J.M.
AU - Rossion, B.
AU - Norcia, A.M.
N1 - This research was funded by a grant from the European Research Council (facessvep 284025) awarded to B.R. and a travel Grant from the Belgian National Scientific Research Fund (A2/5-ROI/JA-1240) awarded to J.L.-S.
PY - 2015/3
Y1 - 2015/3
N2 - Contrast polarity inversion (i.e., turning dark regions light and vice versa) impairs face perception. We investigated the perceptual asymmetry between positive and negative polarity faces (matched for overall luminance) using a sweep VEP approach in the context of face detection (Journal of Vision 12 (2012) 1-18). Phase-scrambled face stimuli alternated at a rate of 3. Hz (6. images/s). The phase coherence of every other stimulus was parametrically increased so that a face gradually emerged over a 20-s stimulation sequence, leading to a 3. Hz response reflecting face detection. Contrary to the 6. Hz response, reflecting low-level visual processing, this 3. Hz response was larger and emerged earlier over right occipito-temporal channels for positive than negative polarity faces. Moreover, the 3. Hz response emerged abruptly to positive polarity faces, whereas it increased linearly for negative polarity faces. In another condition, alternating between a positive and a negative polarity face also elicited a strong 3. Hz response, indicating an asymmetrical representation of positive and negative polarity faces even at supra-threshold levels (i.e., when both stimuli were perceived as faces). Overall, these findings demonstrate distinct perceptual representations of positive and negative polarity faces, independently of low-level cues, and suggest qualitatively different detection processes (template-based matching for positive polarity faces vs. linear accumulation of evidence for negative polarity faces).
AB - Contrast polarity inversion (i.e., turning dark regions light and vice versa) impairs face perception. We investigated the perceptual asymmetry between positive and negative polarity faces (matched for overall luminance) using a sweep VEP approach in the context of face detection (Journal of Vision 12 (2012) 1-18). Phase-scrambled face stimuli alternated at a rate of 3. Hz (6. images/s). The phase coherence of every other stimulus was parametrically increased so that a face gradually emerged over a 20-s stimulation sequence, leading to a 3. Hz response reflecting face detection. Contrary to the 6. Hz response, reflecting low-level visual processing, this 3. Hz response was larger and emerged earlier over right occipito-temporal channels for positive than negative polarity faces. Moreover, the 3. Hz response emerged abruptly to positive polarity faces, whereas it increased linearly for negative polarity faces. In another condition, alternating between a positive and a negative polarity face also elicited a strong 3. Hz response, indicating an asymmetrical representation of positive and negative polarity faces even at supra-threshold levels (i.e., when both stimuli were perceived as faces). Overall, these findings demonstrate distinct perceptual representations of positive and negative polarity faces, independently of low-level cues, and suggest qualitatively different detection processes (template-based matching for positive polarity faces vs. linear accumulation of evidence for negative polarity faces).
KW - Face perception
KW - Contrast reversal
KW - EEG
KW - SSVEP
KW - Sweep VEP
KW - Phase coherance scrambling
U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 25595857
AN - SCOPUS:84921692232
SN - 0042-6989
VL - 108
SP - 8
EP - 19
JO - Vision Research
JF - Vision Research
ER -