The discussion of gender and citations in submission guidelines of 102 political science journals

A. Bekmuratovna R.; Samrawit Berhane; Paulina Dannhäuser; Katelyn Steele Nutley; Ingo Rohlfing

doi:10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6

The discussion of gender and citations in submission guidelines of 102 political science journals

A. Bekmuratovna R., Samrawit Berhane, Paulina Dannhäuser, Katelyn Steele Nutley, Ingo Rohlfing^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of International Relations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Citations of journal articles are a measure of scholarly attention and scientific impact. Across disciplines, including political science, there is evidence indicating the presence of a gender citation gap. The gap represents a gender imbalance in publishing and citations that is likely to be perpetuated as it contributes to follow-up imbalances in hiring or funding decisions. In this paper, we review the submission and publication information of 102 English-language journals from political science. The review is guided by a descriptive research question: How many journals address gender imbalances and gender more generally in their guidelines? We present the results of a mixed-methods content analysis that combines a computational text analysis with the manual, qualitative coding of journal information. We observe that fifteen journals out of 102 address gender and citation behavior by encouraging authors to consider the gender balance of their reference lists. With seven mentions, the share of journals discussing gender and citations is higher for the top-25 journals. There is little discussion of this issue in ECPR journals and APSA section and association journals.

Original language	English
Number of pages	8
Journal	European Political Science
Early online date	5 May 2025
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 5 May 2025

Keywords

Citations
Gender citation gap
Journal guidelines
Publishing

Access to Document

10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6Licence: CC BY

R-2025-The-discussionof-gender-and-citations-EPS-CCBY
Copyright © The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Final published version, 586 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{529a9d1315bf4675ae12395df8ac7dff,

title = "The discussion of gender and citations in submission guidelines of 102 political science journals",

abstract = "Citations of journal articles are a measure of scholarly attention and scientific impact. Across disciplines, including political science, there is evidence indicating the presence of a gender citation gap. The gap represents a gender imbalance in publishing and citations that is likely to be perpetuated as it contributes to follow-up imbalances in hiring or funding decisions. In this paper, we review the submission and publication information of 102 English-language journals from political science. The review is guided by a descriptive research question: How many journals address gender imbalances and gender more generally in their guidelines? We present the results of a mixed-methods content analysis that combines a computational text analysis with the manual, qualitative coding of journal information. We observe that fifteen journals out of 102 address gender and citation behavior by encouraging authors to consider the gender balance of their reference lists. With seven mentions, the share of journals discussing gender and citations is higher for the top-25 journals. There is little discussion of this issue in ECPR journals and APSA section and association journals.",

keywords = "Citations, Gender citation gap, Journal guidelines, Publishing",

author = "R., {A. Bekmuratovna} and Samrawit Berhane and Paulina Dannh{\"a}user and Nutley, {Katelyn Steele} and Ingo Rohlfing",

note = "Funding: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. ",

year = "2025",

month = may,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6",

language = "English",

journal = "European Political Science",

issn = "1680-4333",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The discussion of gender and citations in submission guidelines of 102 political science journals

AU - R., A. Bekmuratovna

AU - Berhane, Samrawit

AU - Dannhäuser, Paulina

AU - Nutley, Katelyn Steele

AU - Rohlfing, Ingo

N1 - Funding: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2025/5/5

Y1 - 2025/5/5

N2 - Citations of journal articles are a measure of scholarly attention and scientific impact. Across disciplines, including political science, there is evidence indicating the presence of a gender citation gap. The gap represents a gender imbalance in publishing and citations that is likely to be perpetuated as it contributes to follow-up imbalances in hiring or funding decisions. In this paper, we review the submission and publication information of 102 English-language journals from political science. The review is guided by a descriptive research question: How many journals address gender imbalances and gender more generally in their guidelines? We present the results of a mixed-methods content analysis that combines a computational text analysis with the manual, qualitative coding of journal information. We observe that fifteen journals out of 102 address gender and citation behavior by encouraging authors to consider the gender balance of their reference lists. With seven mentions, the share of journals discussing gender and citations is higher for the top-25 journals. There is little discussion of this issue in ECPR journals and APSA section and association journals.

AB - Citations of journal articles are a measure of scholarly attention and scientific impact. Across disciplines, including political science, there is evidence indicating the presence of a gender citation gap. The gap represents a gender imbalance in publishing and citations that is likely to be perpetuated as it contributes to follow-up imbalances in hiring or funding decisions. In this paper, we review the submission and publication information of 102 English-language journals from political science. The review is guided by a descriptive research question: How many journals address gender imbalances and gender more generally in their guidelines? We present the results of a mixed-methods content analysis that combines a computational text analysis with the manual, qualitative coding of journal information. We observe that fifteen journals out of 102 address gender and citation behavior by encouraging authors to consider the gender balance of their reference lists. With seven mentions, the share of journals discussing gender and citations is higher for the top-25 journals. There is little discussion of this issue in ECPR journals and APSA section and association journals.

KW - Citations

KW - Gender citation gap

KW - Journal guidelines

KW - Publishing

U2 - 10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6

DO - 10.1057/s41304-025-00528-6

M3 - Article

SN - 1680-4333

JO - European Political Science

JF - European Political Science

ER -

The discussion of gender and citations in submission guidelines of 102 political science journals

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this