The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: does content matter?

Nicole Tausch, Jared B. Kenworthy, Miles Hewstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)


M. Rothbart and B. Park (1986) demonstrated that, consistent with the common negativity bias, positive traits are difficult to confirm and easy to disconfirm, whereas the opposite is true for negative traits. This article extends their analysis by showing that trait (dis-) confirmability is moderated by trait content (warmth vs. competence). Study I identifies a trait sample representative of warmth and competence. Study 2 shows a strong negativity effect for warmth and a reduced (or absent) negativity effect for competence. Study 3 examines trait properties related to the behavioral range of the trait possessor and to the motivational goals of the perceiver as predictors of trait (dis-) confirmability. The theoretical and practical implications of the authors' findings are discussed, and avenues for future research are suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-556
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007


  • Social perception
  • Trait attribution
  • Trait disconfirmability
  • Behavior diagnosticity
  • Motivation
  • Attribution
  • Attention
  • Model
  • Dispositions
  • Impressions
  • Competence
  • Perception
  • Prejudice
  • Behaviors
  • Morality

Cite this