Abstract
The ‘post 9/11 wars’ should prompt western military thought to reconsider its assumption that war and policy exist in a linear continuum. Characterised by early operational successes which promised quick victories, the western interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya gave way to protracted conflict, leading to unsatisfactory outcomes at best and outright defeat at worst. These wars challenge Clausewitz's presumption that war is the continuation of policy by other means, prompting us in turn to rethink how we read On War. More importantly, they demand a more critical examination of the links between the causes of wars and their consequences. Strategic thought aligns ends, ways and means in a continuum that rarely applies in practice. War's place in international relations theory and its role in establishing world order have been characterised more often by unfounded expectations of an ideal that is only rarely achieved in practice than by realism founded on actual experience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | How wars end |
| Subtitle of host publication | theory and practice |
| Editors | Damien Kingsbury, Richard Iron |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon, Oxon |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Pages | 11-27 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000825305, 9781003317487 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032329512, 9781032329529 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Dec 2022 |
Publication series
| Name | Routledge advances in defence studies |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The causes of war - and their consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver