The 2001 UK census: remarkable resource or bygone legacy of the 'pencil and paper era'?

Paul Joseph Boyle, D Dorling

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    35 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    National censuses are expensive. They are conducted infrequently. They collect information that some feel infringes their human rights, and people are required by law to complete them. The outputs are not perfect, and in some situations may be misleading. Some suggest that censuses hark back to a period when regularly collected administrative data were not available. These are some of the views held about national censuses. Why, then, would others argue that they are an essential resource? In this paper, we consider some of the pros and cons of conducting national censuses, before introducing a series of papers that draw on early data available from the 2007 UK census. We argue that these papers, and the wealth of research that will be conducted in the future with 2001 census data, make a strong case for supporting the compulsory collection of personal information about the 'entire' population every ten years.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-100
    Number of pages10
    JournalArea
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

    Keywords

    • 2001 UK census
    • one number census
    • human rights
    • administrative data
    • ONE-NUMBER CENSUS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The 2001 UK census: remarkable resource or bygone legacy of the 'pencil and paper era'?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this