Abstract
This article examines the determinants of tax non-compliance when we recognise the existence of an imperfectly competitive "tax advice" industry supplying schemes which help taxpayers reduce their tax liability. We apply a traditional industrial organisation framework to model the behaviour of this industry. This tells us that an important factor determining the equilibrium price and hence, the level of non-compliance, is the convexity of the demand schedule. We show that in this context, this convexity is affected by the distribution of pre-tax income, the progressivity of the tax-schedule and the way in which monitoring and penalties vary with income. It is shown that lower pre-tax income inequality as well as a less progressive tax code may cause more tax minimisation activities. Therefore, the frequently advocated policy of reducing the highest tax rate may fail as a policy directed at improving tax discipline. One way of offsetting the possible harm to tax compliance from a less progressive tax could be an adjustment of the penalty and monitoring functions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 594-607 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | European Economic Review |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 30 Sept 2009 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Tax compliance
- Tax administration
- Inequality
- Tax progressivity
- Tax monitoring
- Penalty function
- CONSISTENT CONJECTURES
- EVASION
- CORRUPTION
- UNCERTAINTY
- INEQUALITY
- AVOIDANCE
- TAXATION
- MODEL
- FIRM
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tax progressivity, income distribution and tax non-compliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver