Abstract
Many recent papers suggest that the basic flex-price target zone model does not perform well empirically. This paper investigates the testable implications of a sticky-price target zone model and finds that, to a limited extent, it has a better empirical performance than the simplest flex-price model. However (in terms of nominal variables) the sticky-price model is found to be observationally equivalent to the flex-price model when the latter is extended to include intra-marginal intervention and realignments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 96-112 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | The Economic Journal |
Volume | 104 |
Issue number | 422 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 1994 |