Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry

J. A. Cook, A. P. Botello, A. Elders, A. Fathi Ali, A. Azuara-Blanco, C. Fraser, K. McCormack, Jennifer Margaret Burr, Surveillance of Ocular Hypertension Study Group()

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

142 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)


OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement of tonometers available for clinical practice with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the most commonly accepted reference device. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of directly comparative studies assessing the agreement of 1 or more tonometers with the reference tonometer (GAT). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11 582 participants (15 525 eyes) were included. METHODS: Summary 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were produced for each comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement, recordability, and reliability. RESULTS: A total of 102 studies, including 130 paired comparisons, were included, representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer, Ocuton S, handheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen. The agreement (95% limits) seemed to vary across tonometers: 0.2 mmHg (-3.8 to 4.3 mmHg) for the NCT to 2.7 mmHg (-4.1 to 9.6 mmHg) for the Ocuton S. The estimated proportion within 2 mmHg of the GAT ranged from 33% (Ocuton S) to 66% and 59% (NCT and HAT, respectively). Substantial inter- and intraobserver variability were observed for all tonometers. CONCLUSIONS: The NCT and HAT seem to achieve a measurement closest to the GAT. However, there was substantial variability in measurements both within and between studies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1552-1557
Number of pages5
Issue number8
Early online date10 May 2012
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this