Surveying drifting icebergs and ice islands: deterioration detection and mass estimation with aerial photogrammetry and laser scanning

Anna J. Crawford, Derek Mueller , Gabriel Joyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Icebergs and ice islands (large, tabular icebergs) are challenging targets to survey due to their size, mobility, remote locations, and potentially difficult environmental conditions. Here, we assess the precision and utility of aerial photography surveying with structure-from-motion multi-view stereo photogrammetry processing (SfM) and vessel-based terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for iceberg deterioration detection and mass estimation. For both techniques, we determine the minimum amount of change required to reliably resolve iceberg deterioration, the deterioration detection threshold (DDT), using triplicate surveys of two iceberg survey targets. We also calculate their relative uncertainties for iceberg mass estimation. The quality of deployed Global Positioning System (GPS) units that were used for drift correction and scale assignment was a major determinant of point cloud precision. When dual-frequency GPS receivers were deployed, DDT values of 2.5 and 0.40 m were calculated for the TLS and SfM point clouds, respectively. In contrast, values of 6.6 and 3.4 m were calculated when tracking beacons with lower-quality GPS were used. The SfM dataset was also more precise when used for iceberg mass estimation, and we recommend further development of this technique for iceberg-related end-uses.
Original languageEnglish
Article number575
Number of pages26
JournalRemote Sensing
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Icebergs
  • Ice islands
  • Terrestrial laser scanning
  • Structure-from-motion photogrammetry
  • Change detection
  • Ice hazards

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surveying drifting icebergs and ice islands: deterioration detection and mass estimation with aerial photogrammetry and laser scanning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this