Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence

M. Boniel-Nissim, I. Tabak, J. Mazur, A. Borraccino, F. Brooks, R. Gommans, W. van der Sluijs, E. Zsiros, W. Craig, Y. Harel-Fisch, E. Finne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the impact of electronic media (EM) use on teenagers’ life satisfaction (LS) and to assess the potential moderating effect of supportive communication with parents (SCP). Methods: Data were drawn from the cross-national Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study (2009/2010) in Canada, England, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Israel, The Netherlands, Poland and Scotland. Sample size: 53,973 students aged 11–15 years. Results: More hours per day spent on the computer were associated with lower LS; more EM communication with friends with higher LS. This relationship became negative if EM use reached and exceeded a certain threshold. SCP moderated the effect of EM communication with friends, but not computer use for the total sample. SCP seems to be more important than computer use or EM communication with friends for LS and it seems to buffer negative effects of EM use. Conclusions: Communication with parents seems to buffer the negative effects of EM use on LS during adolescence. Higher computer use was related to lower LS, but “optimal” frequency of EM communication with friends was country specific.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-198
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Public Health
Volume60
Issue number2
Early online date31 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Keywords

  • Life satisfaction
  • Adolescents
  • Computer use
  • Supportive communication with parents
  • Cross-national study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this